What precaution should members follow regarding the use of flex cuffs during CDU?

The rationale behind choosing to opt for regular handcuffs instead of using a third flex cuff is rooted in the need for ensuring the safety and security of both the detainee and the officers involved. Regular handcuffs provide a more controlled method of restraint and are designed to prevent excessive movement while still offering a level of comfort and security.

Using a third flex cuff may lead to complications such as increased risk of injury to the detainee, potential failures in the restraint system, and issues with managing restraints effectively during transport or in volatile situations. Regular handcuffs are generally more reliable and easier to use in a variety of scenarios, allowing for better management of potentially aggressive or non-compliant individuals.

In this context, the use of flex cuffs should be considered with caution; they are typically employed in specific situations or when standard handcuffs are not available, rather than as a first option or in an excessive manner. This approach ensures that officers maintain a standard operating procedure that adheres to best practices for restraint, prioritizing safety and effectiveness.